|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: QTo | |||
| overlimp from CO or button |
   
|
0 | 0% |
| fold from CO or button |
  
|
4 | 28.57% |
| fold from CO, raise from button |
  
|
2 | 14.29% |
| overlimp from CO, raise from button |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| raise from either CO or button |
  
|
8 | 57.14% |
| Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
11-10-2005, 04:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
A Better Paul Phillips Poll
Here's a better poll for this Phillips sitch:
|
|
#3
11-10-2005, 05:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A Better Paul Phillips Poll
Why is it persons with low post count making these stupid polls?
|
|
#4
11-10-2005, 05:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A Better Paul Phillips Poll
Calling 2+2 "4" kind of misses the point.
|
|
#5
11-10-2005, 05:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A Better Paul Phillips Poll
I thought it was short for 4um
|
|
#6
11-10-2005, 05:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A Better Paul Phillips Poll
I'm locking this thread. I have said repeatedly that I erred in actually deleting the post.
There has already been a poll which makes it clear that most people don't think the banning was correct. |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
