Re: I\'ve been Thinking
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Which part of the statement, Vulturesrow?
[/ QUOTE ]
That any part of the Bible is given in a historical sense.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well that's surprising to me.
Do you mean NONE of it? Is that your view too?
What about all the historical descriptions of events, at least?
And what about the parts of the New Testament that supersede the Old Testament--doesn't that render certain things from from the Old Testament moot or obsolete? For instance, certain directives given by Jesus. People no longer need practice animal sacrifices, forgive one's enemy instead of an eye for an eye, etc.
Some elaboration would really pique my interest here.
|