Re: High Stakes online and B&M
We can agree to disagree about those hands. They were interesting hands to post, the lot of them, and I don't want to imply that you aren't an excellent player. Still, I stand by everything that I have written in each hand. In each case, I'm sure you had reasons to do what you did because you were there and I wasn't, but typically, I think you are incorrect, especially in the 44 hand. That said, the hands are interesting and have sparked lots of good discussion.
I know my advice works, because I do play big games, have played them for awhile, and have always won. If you play like I do and are worried about being labeled a weak-tight hump, then whatever. I'm sure that my regular opponents, especially in a short game, would strongly disagree with that assessment.
|