Thread: 97s.
View Single Post
  #14  
Old 12-14-2005, 10:22 AM
-Skeme- -Skeme- is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: S. Korea ($100 NL)
Posts: 2,694
Default Re: 97s.

[ QUOTE ]
And even if you did, bluffing shorties willing to gamble sucks.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why would that suck?


[ QUOTE ]
Fair enough.
Shorties often play top pair this way:
Call. Call. Call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Right, and they often fold them once TP becomes not TP on a Queen turn. So far we have:

-chip donation (the logic is excellent)
-we need a plan for his river move (he'd be all in if he called)
-he folds a flush draw (that's what we want, please fold)
-i probably dont play aces this way (oh, but i do!)
-bluffing short stacks, who are willing to gamble, when you have aces really sucks (this whole winning money thing sucks)

Nobody has a problem with my pansy ass flop bet?

I guess this hand just sucks. I'm tired. He hemmed and hawed, then made some weird type of crying call with 63d. He wins.
Reply With Quote