[ErrantNight]

i agree this is very complicated... but there's a standard line for this very complicated situation... what have you read that differentiates this hand from th WA/WB line?

hero contends villain's range of hands is large, meaning it's more likely he is semi-bluff betting the turn. to me, this screams DO NOT C/R in loud, neon lights, and might argue for a c/call on the river as opposed to the typical bet... although since most of villain's range of hands include pocket pairs, these would seem to me the type of hands that might pay off a river donkbet but check behind if checked to. making the standard line even more obviously correct than usual. finally, since hero thinks villain is relatively straightforward and seems unafraid of being bluff-raised, it would seem yet even MORE beneficial to use the standard wawb line because you can safely fold to a river raise.