[andyfox]

"Do you think that overthrowing Hussein was discussed during meetings in previous administrations?"

I would imagine it was. But it wasn't acted upon and, therefore, there was no duplicity in explanation about why it was done. Had it been done, I'm, sure there would have been such duplicity. As I've posted many times, this is par for the course.

"Also do you believe that Bush only started being concerned about terrorism as of 9/11?"

Seems that way, from the testimony of several individuals.

"Was the Clinton administration ever duplicitous?"

Of course. For a while, Clinton was blaming Bin Laden for anything and everything without any supporting evidence. Governments lie all the time, especially when they go to war. It makes sennse logically that they would, and the empirical evidence is substantial and overwhelming.