[pudley4]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't want to name names and get people mad at me, but sometimes I feel that some of the articles are just egoist self serving loads of crap. The writer's analyze a hand, making sure to drop any names they feel, then tout their superb play, and it all works out well in the hand. While some of the writers are self critical and comprehensive, I feel around 1/3 of the articles are self-serving or just boring and basic. I would like to see more interesting articles, but I don't want to criticize anyone in particular at this point. Does anyone else feel this way or am I alone here?

[/ QUOTE ]

Anyone who submits an article and has it published should be ready to accept both praise and criticism. Instead of generalizing in your post, come right out and discuss/critique the article(s) you have a problem with. That's exactly what this forum is for.

Also, you are welcome to write a (better) article yourself.