View Single Post
  #95  
Old 11-21-2005, 06:11 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sklansky on Abortion

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You failed to mention that your argument would be incoherent nonsense.

[/ QUOTE ]

If thats the tack youd like to take than we can just call it quits.

[/ QUOTE ]

Forgive me. I get a bit frustrated when someone indicates that they can make a rational argument, but then getting that argument out of them is harder than extracting teeth.

[ QUOTE ]
Ive put it as simply as I could but your responses show that you havent really grasped my arguments at all. This could be my fault for putting it clearly enough I admit.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why don't you outline your COMPLETE (your word) argument for the criteria you believe is best in determining personhood (beginning and end). Looking back at all of your posts, I try to piece together what you are saying. It would be helpful if you would outline it in one post, without leaving out any pertinent details (such as the definitions of "capacity" or "personal acts").

Please make sure that your argument addresses how this criteria would be used by medical science in determining when a person is no longer a person (ie: dead).
Reply With Quote