Re: The evolution of the mid-high stakes forum
[ QUOTE ]
Are you advocating using probability triples at the table? I feel with little time to think and only subjective source of randomness, pts will have less value. However, after the hand I agree they provide a good way to quanitfy how we should've mixed up our play at a certain point.
[/ QUOTE ]
I assume you are talking to me.
Yes, I advocate them, the same way I advocate using the complex math we often do at the table. You do it precisely away from the table, and then you do it intuitively at the table.
As far as randomness, my NL friend uses dice when he plays online against tough opposition. Doing it live would be trickier of course, but the old second-on-the-watch trick can work, among others.
good luck.
eric
|