[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Unless you want to equivocate the word "nature".


[/ QUOTE ]

It's not an equivocation because He had two natures. But I can't give a full, logical explanation of what that means. If the doctrine was that He had one nature and then gave contradictory descriptions of that nature it would be illogical. Having two natures isn't illogical, it's just impossible to understand what it means.

[/ QUOTE ]

So he had 1 nature, then 2. That's a change of "nature" then. His nature was to have 1 nature... then his nature was to have 2 natures. Whatever that means. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]