[jt1]

[ QUOTE ]
True. Instead of all the kids, the teacher asks for volunteers and gets some. Is this okay? If that's still a little iffy, how bout the teacher brings in two pornstars and has them bang on the students' desks (these are 1st graders, remember). If the school claims this is "teaching" them, I don't see how this decision does not allow a parent to object. I guess it puts a lot of pressure at the very local levels, but what redress does the parent have if the school does something like the above examples I gave?


[/ QUOTE ]


Sex in public is illegal becuae it disturbs the peace. But that aside, I would say that a parent has the right to petetion, organinze, address the school board, put a referendum on the ballot, pull his/her kid out of the school, sue the school for emotional distress, etc. My point still stands, however. Ignoring the fact that your example is a criminal violation of most local statutes, I argue that if the community agreed that porn stars in school is a valuable teaching tool then that particular community has the right to hire them....especially if midgits are involved [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Because I do things that many people consider degenerate and dangerous, yet I still want to do them, I agree to let others do things that I disagree with as long as no one gets hurt. (in this case, with enough evidence, i could be easily convinced that first graders watching a live porn show is a form of emotional abuse.)