Re: A fine reason to ban weapons
Well...first of all, humans are not horses, so that's not even a fair analogy. But...what I am saying is that there is no harm in someone merely owning a gun. Explain to me who is harmed by ownership of a gun. And, the reason the "who" does not need to be restricted is because everyone has a choice. Punish those who make a poor choice to discharge the firearm into someone else, not someone who simply likes firearms.
Look, I know that my drunk driving analogy is a radical way to look at it, but after all the meaningful discourse we've had on this thread, I think you can do better than "You are wrong."
|