View Single Post
  #114  
Old 10-11-2005, 07:56 PM
tylerdurden tylerdurden is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: actually pvn
Posts: 0
Default Re: A fine reason to ban weapons

[ QUOTE ]
Exactly. The owners of the road make the rules not the owner of the car.

[/ QUOTE ]

Right. YOU don't get to make the rules that get applied to EVERYONE. You can only tell me what to do with my gun when I'm on YOUR property.

[ QUOTE ]
What the driver does effects his fellow road users which is why he has rules to follow. A gun owner has rules to follow for the same reason. When and where he discharges his weapon, where he keeps it, how he safeguards against its misuse can have consequenses for other people. I am of the opinion that those rules should be more stringent than they are.

[/ QUOTE ]

The rule is "don't initiate violence." What else do you need?

[ QUOTE ]
You don't think it is prevented? An interesting experiment - two societies, one with regulation over medical matters and one without - which would be healthier? Where would you rather live?

[/ QUOTE ]

The latter. No doubt.

[ QUOTE ]
And from this you deduce that most laws are frivolous?

[/ QUOTE ]

Not from that alone, but yes, most laws are frivolous. Really, all you need is "thou shall not kill" and "thou shall not steal." Everything else is pretty much BS.
Reply With Quote