[ QUOTE ]
[RANT]If you aren't depositing from an outside source, ie losing, you arent contributing to the bottom bottom line.

[/ QUOTE ]
wrong, every hand played that is raked contributes to the bottom line, winning players play more hands, and usually at higher limits, increasing rake, and drawing players to a site b/c there are more games to choose from

[ QUOTE ]

Party cut it down, Ladbrokes never did it and UB dropped it.

[/ QUOTE ]
wrong, all 3 of those sites currently have rakeback programs through affiliates

[ QUOTE ]
You just need to learn to play poker better!

[/ QUOTE ]
wrong, if your not a winning player rake is not going to cover your losses

[ QUOTE ]
Rakeback attracts sharks, sharks kill fish who leave, site dies.




[/ QUOTE ]you just said that people who play for rakeback need to learn to play better, but now they are sharks. a site thrives by keeping their players loyal to their site through incentives. Sites die b/c they suck and there are plenty of other options. If a site doesnt have anything to offer why would you continue to play there when there are 12 others sites that do.

winning players will win, losing players will lose, regardless of rakeback