Re: This was a Clarkmeister, was it?
[ QUOTE ]
you are confusing -EV on a single street with a -EV play. given a non-zero pot on the river, a -EV for one street play can become +EV (as in calling one bet in a 20 BB pot with only a 10% chance to win).
check-folding is *always* zero EV.
[/ QUOTE ]
Allright, so in clarkmeister's theorem, betting is -EV, but the whole street is +EV? Is that what youre saying?
|