Re: Fallacious terms - \"Regression to mean\"
'then you will in due course, experience a contrary run of cards that will make you regress to your mean win rate.
'
i think it is you who are misusing it.
assume win rate of 300/hr for 100 hours.
then assume 30/hr for 6000 hours.
so for 6000 hours you have 30,000 + 180,000
so winrate is 210/6 or 70/2 or 35/hr.
probably better if i didnt make the good run so good. heh
|