Re: NL HU all-in/fold game theory Q
Sorry, I dont think my post explained what I was getting at. I understand the concepts of Nash Equilibria etc (but I'm sure others will benefit from your explanation). I just felt that saying that the house played "optimally" was a little vague, especially for those who maybe arent as well versed in game-theoretic concepts. I thought maybe saying that the house was a "rational player" would have been a better way of putting it. I understood what you meant, but thought that others might benefit a different description.
John
|