[jdock99]

You forgot one word:
maybe

Obviously, if I was confident that my win rate was accurate I would have already made the move to 15/30 and not have bothered writing the thread in the first place. Of course I realize this is a small sample size and I theoretically could actually be a big winner at 10-20 and a loser at 5-10 and 15-30.

That being said, I do not play 10,000 hands every 3 days, as poker is not my profession or even high on my list of preferrential hobbies. And so, I might have to make decisions about my play, such as when to move up or down in limits, w/o having 100% accurate statistical evidence to support those decisions.

The whole point of the thread was to ask other's opinions about 'skipping' a limit, specifically 10-20 6 max, and whether or not it worked out for them, NOT to ask if I had a statistically high enough sample size for my win rates to be 100% accurate. For those of you that realized this and responded constructively "Thank you very much."