[elwoodblues]

This is nothing that I'm going to lose sleep over, but I kind of agree with Jedster here. It's one thing if it was called a Christmas tree and then to do nothing to change the name. But, to change the name has only 1 purpose, and that purpose is a religious one.

To those squibbling over whether all trees decorated in December are "Christmas Trees"; would you really be confused what they were refering to when referencing a tree decorated in December as a "holiday tree"?

Minor issue, no value but for a religious one --- doesn't sound like something I want Congress working on.