[ QUOTE ]
...keep this thread going..."worst post with a fire thingy next to it"
[/ QUOTE ]
Can do. I caught the avatar. It was splendid. give out the link so i/we can stare hypnotically at the (hopefully) larger version.
now, about
:
[ QUOTE ]
Monstrous boobies are monstrously overrated.
[/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]
see, heres the thing. theres a bigger=better rule that hold only within boundarys. You have to go apples vs apples. Theres monsterous, on a "plump" woman, wheres its just droop/sag, and extra skin and all smooshy fat. thats no good. i dont like those, not much.
But theres sort of "supercritical" breasts. where they retain the integrity of the nice smaller ones, but somehow manage to pull of being really big, with the girl still having, like, shes low BMI. Firm. Goot.
So my thinking, you cant overrate monsterous breasts if they are BIG and NICE. its simply the superlative of any description you give. where i grant leeway is the fatty big, could be called overrated, but i mean, whos been rating those so high to begin with? Not me!
Anyways, theres my mini-rant Sam, anyone wanna take this ball and run with it?
BL' <--all his porn is "naturals"
