View Single Post
  #1  
Old 04-11-2005, 01:28 AM
Nightwish Nightwish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 182
Default Acey-deucey multiway

This is a pretty strange hand. I just sat down and posted in the CO.

SB is a LAG, UTG is loose passive, and UTG+2 is tight passive.

What do you guys think? Good/bad/indifferent?


Party Poker 15/30 Hold'em (10 handed) converter

Preflop: Nightwish is CO with A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. Nightwish posts a blind of $15.
UTG <font color="#A500AF">(Loose Passive)</font> calls, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 <font color="#A500AF">(Tight Passive)</font> calls, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, Nightwish (poster) checks, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB</font><font color="#A500AF">(LAG)</font> <font color="#CC3333">raises</font>, BB calls, UTG<font color="#A500AF">(Loose Passive)</font> calls, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2<font color="#A500AF">(Tight Passive)</font> calls, Nightwish calls.

Flop: (12 SB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(6 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">LAG bets</font>, BB folds, Loose Passive calls, UTG+1 folds, Tight Passive calls, Nightwish calls.

Turn: (8 BB) 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
LAG checks, Loose Passive checks, Tight Passive checks, <font color="#CC3333">Nightwish bets</font>, LAG calls, Loose Passive calls, Tight Passive calls.

River: (12 BB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
LAG checks, Loose Passive checks, Tight Passive checks, Nightwish checks.

Final Pot: 12 BB
<font color="#009B00">Main Pot: 12 BB, between Tight Passive, Nightwish, LAG and Loose Passive.</font>
Reply With Quote