Re: Set over set uncommon, sure ..but
I never claimed to be experienced or knowledgable. I said that the other people who posted here (for the most part) were. I also don't know what the true definition of "High" or "Low" stakes is. My point was that your question might be better suited for the smaller of the forums. Maybe it isn't... I was just making a suggestion.
I hope you were joking when you said the following:
[ QUOTE ]
I see it [set-over-set] all the time... especially in a room with a gigantic bad beat jackpot.
[/ QUOTE ]
So you are using a ridiculous statement to back up the idea that your original statement was logical?!? Interesting.
1) The idea that one cardroom has more set-over-set than another is far from logical.
2) The idea that having a jackpot somehow affects it is also absurd.
3) Playing a hand with the hopes of flopping a set only to fear set-over-set might not be illogical but it is certainly irrational.
If anything.... just think about #3 and consider this "conversation" over.
Software developer, ay? You must do networking or web development because your math/probablity skills are clearly lacking if you think that being inside of one building vs. another affects card distribution.
Set sail....
-tpir
|