[ QUOTE ]
You're first statement is really dumb. In 1996 Clinton won with 49.2% of the vote, Dole had 40.7%, and Perot had 8.4%. Let's assume that Dole got EVERY one of Perot's votes (a mighty assumption, indeed), which would give him 49.1%. Clinton still wins, dumbass.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, there's no doubt that shaun is a dumbass.
That having been said, your satement above is wrong. If every Perot vote in 1996 had gone to Dole, then 11 states would have switched their electoral votes: Arizona, Florida, Kentucky, Missouri, Nevada, New Hamphire, Ohio, Oregon, Penssylvania, Tennessee and Wisconsin. That would have been a 133-EV swing, giving Dole the presidency with 292 EVs vs. 246 for Clinton.

[ QUOTE ]
(I won't call you a dumbass for misspelling 'their' and 'populace')

[/ QUOTE ]

Spelling flames are TOTALLY LAME. Especially when one makes usage errors in the VERY SAME POST. You're free to reread your post (or even just what I quoted above) to see what I mean. Please, let's try to do better.