Thread: Cost of equity
View Single Post
  #21  
Old 11-28-2005, 11:20 PM
Evan Evan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sthief09: im kinda drunk from the nyquil
Posts: 1,562
Default Re: Cost of equity

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Okay, in general it may be true, but not often enough to make the blanket statement that indices are less risky than stocks.

The beta of a market is 1, it is not true that no stock's beta is <1.

[/ QUOTE ]

In the way that you used it, Beta represents correlation to the market.

Thus, while it can be used to measure the level of market risk; it can not be used to measure individual stock risk.

I suggest you spend some time on riskgrades

[/ QUOTE ]
I know beta is not a measure of an individual stock's risk. I didn't mean to imply that. It was a seperate but somewhat related statement, just in case people reading this thread weren't aware that betas can be <1.
Reply With Quote