Re: Jacks on the bubble +1
[ QUOTE ]
Opponents seem typical. Haven't seen them do anything particularly stupid, but the initial raiser is probably one of the weaker players.
***** Hand History for Game 1928952583 *****
NL Hold'em $30 Buy-in + $3 Entry Fee Trny:11496166 Level:6 Blinds(150/300) - Thursday, April 21, 15:58:07 EDT 2005
Table Table 11645 (Real Money)
Seat 8 is the button
Total number of players : 5
Seat 1: nott0m ( $1750 )
Seat 2: Oahuraised ( $1230 )
Seat 4: jshader1 ( $1365 )
Seat 8: Kingmamajama ( $2955 )
Seat 10: rambling_man ( $700 )
Trny:11496166 Level:6
Blinds(150/300)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to nott0m [ Js Jd ]
Oahuraised raises [600].
jshader1 is all-In [1365]
Kingmamajama folds.
rambling_man folds.
Hero's action?
[/ QUOTE ]
thing is, you dont want to play these here against 2 others (seems likely, right?)...you them both covered but they have the same size stack so you dont benefit by having 2nd best hand either.
So yeah, it could turn out to be A4s and 99 but hey, Id feel ok laying these down and being 1 step closer to the money...Im sure others will disagree here but I would lay this down.
|