Re: Casino Bonus Summary (or: $565 in free money)
[ QUOTE ]
AA vs KK for $200 is definately more risky than clearing a $200 CON (we're talking about CON right?) bonus at blackjack. Less $EV too...
[/ QUOTE ]
If by CON you mean Casino-On-Net, no.
If you mean "online casino", yes. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Specifically it was about Casino365 which (unfortunately) isn't no risk like the Cryptos as it treats all wagered money as yours first, so you can't play, lose and withdraw your original deposit. (you ain't losing bonus money when you're playing etc)
I decided when I started Casino Whoring I would *never* use my own money on something so risky, that's why I'm trying to do the math using the AA vs KK example.
Cheers,
SDM
|