Too passive?
My on-line (low-limit) play has undergone a major metamorphosis -- from loose-aggressive to weak-tight. My loose aggressive phase lost me lots of money. My weak-tight play, as bad as that sounds, has been very profitable. Anyway, I think I could use a little more strength in my play. Here is a hand I played very passively. Please let me know what you think:
I'm in MP with 8[img]/forums/images/icons/club.gif[/img] 8[img]/forums/images/icons/diamond.gif[/img] . Two limpers to me, I call, folded to the blinds who come along.
Flop: 6[img]/forums/images/icons/club.gif[/img] Q[img]/forums/images/icons/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/forums/images/icons/heart.gif[/img]
Checked through.
Turn: [ 6[img]/forums/images/icons/club.gif[/img] Q[img]/forums/images/icons/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/forums/images/icons/heart.gif[/img] ] 7[img]/forums/images/icons/spade.gif[/img]
SB checks, BB bets, folded to me and I call as does SB.
River: [ 6[img]/forums/images/icons/club.gif[/img] Q[img]/forums/images/icons/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/forums/images/icons/heart.gif[/img] 7[img]/forums/images/icons/spade.gif[/img] ] 9[img]/forums/images/icons/diamond.gif[/img]
Checked through.
All comments welcome, thanks.
Morgan
|