[jaxmike]

[ QUOTE ]
My post is indeed a response to MMMMMM's "explanation" for the banning of jokerswild. To spell it out, MMMMMM's position is that jokerswild was banned because jokerswild "defamed" MMMMMM by stating that MMMMMM advocated violence against Americans.

In fact, MMMMMM does advocate violence against Americans, as I have stated. Truthful statements (and statements of opinion) are not defamatory.

So we shall see whether MMMMMM (1) admits he was wrong and reinstates jokerswild; (2) exercises his power as moderator to ban me, thereby proving that "defamatory" to him means "somthing I don't like"; or (3) comes up with new explanation as to why jokerswild should be banned, which we shall all then evaluate.

[/ QUOTE ]

Question my logic all you want. This is truly impressive compared to anything I have done in the past.

Simply put, how do you justify claiming that MMMMMM supports/advocates/whatever violence against American citizens?

In fact, MMMMMM does advocate violence against Americans, as I have stated.

You wrote. Where is your evidence? In the fact that he banned JW? Do you not see the problem with your assertion?