Re: I was wrong, you were right, but that\'s why i joined 2+2, 80K hand
"And anyone that's good enough to beat a game should know well before 100,000 hands if they're a favorite in the game or not without even looking at their results."
wrong. anyone that's good enough and lucky enough to beat a game for 100k hands will at least sometimes be thinking he's a bigger favorite than he really is in a game or if he's run bad/played bad he will think he's not nearly as much as a favorite as he actually might really be.
see? all that matters is this: the long term is so long to worry about it is silly. playing your best (and that includes game selection) each hour of each session is all that ever matters. but how much you beat a game for in 50k hands doesnt mean much of anything.
|