[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
"Exceedingly Good PLayer" min-reraising PF?
Isn't this an oxymoron...

[/ QUOTE ]
sry dude, but i dont think you are qualified to comment.

[/ QUOTE ]

Care to explain?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd imagine it's because you're not very articulate, and you make a lot of marginal arguments very aggressively:

[ QUOTE ]

There is no arguement to be made as to why the villain's min-checkraise PF was the correct play. If there is please inform me so I can min re-raise more often.

[/ QUOTE ]
Notes: he didn't minraise, and even if he did, there are arguments to be made for it, especially live. [Cheap information, confusing the donk that's terrified of you.] Also, it's 'argument'.