[MMMMMM]

Sorry for the tone. I thought you should not have tried to make a point like that when the "Islamic Fundamentalist side" apparently concurs as well and you simply ignored evidence of that.

There is no link in the article but the material is quoted directly from the Islamist site and the site is named, so I don't see why anyone would have trouble finding that site if they want to. Personally I would rather not visit Islamist sites. I once or twice visited al-Mahajiroun, and it was indeed all it was purported to be. Scary stuff.

By the way the article cites not only the Islamist site al-Qal'a, but also the Islamist site al-Islah, both in reference to their explanations of bin-Laden's message. Feel free to check them out if you wish to; perhaps you will encounter more detailed commentary on bin-Laden's message (as well as some other things bound to be of interest).