Thread: Cost of equity
View Single Post
  #10  
Old 11-28-2005, 05:43 PM
Evan Evan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sthief09: im kinda drunk from the nyquil
Posts: 1,562
Default Re: Cost of equity

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This is wrong. There is no way "the index" is always less risky than an individual stock.

[/ QUOTE ]

In general, the risk in owning an index is less than the risk of holding a single stock, due to diversification reducing the overall risk!

That said, some indexes are overdiversified, and you can achieve similar diversification risk reduction by holding a few select stocks.

[/ QUOTE ]

Okay, in general it may be true, but not often enough to make the blanket statement that indices are less risky than stocks.

The beta of a market is 1, it is not true that no stock's beta is <1.
Reply With Quote