[ QUOTE ]
... frequently raising a lot of speculative hands as well as your premium hands can create a very lucrative situation. This is the type of player that flawless is. It is more profitable than the TAG way, if done correctly.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am well aware that flawless is cut from a different cloth. I am usually amazed at the way he plays a lot of hands. When I first started reading his posts I thought he was being sarcastic. Then it slowly dawned on me ... he really plays this way!

So, if you agree with my assessment that in this situation 109s is probably not best, does the money gained from jamming against inferior hands compensate for what is lost to superior hand/s plus what is lost post-flop? Does this line's deception value gained outweigh the practical difficulty of going against the grain of the hand type and its "correct" play?

In other words, is the EV for jamming greater than the EV for limping? I still doubt that it is, but I would welcome any attemp to convince me otherwise.