Re: Sklansky has it backwards
"On the other side, as far as a belief in God, or a higher-being, a decent amount of astronomers, cosmologists, physicists, philosophers, etc., come to believe in the existence of such a being. It doesn't mean they worship it, or think it is in charge of his or her destiny. Instead, since their studies have brought them to the boundaries of the universe and have unravelled many mysteries, and uncovered many new ones, they at least consider the possibility that something (or someone) started all of this. Something put these laws in place. i.e., they believe the existence of a greater being COULD be a logical explanation to WHY relativity (or gravity, etc. etc.) exist"
That type of belief is on MY side of this argument.
|