Thread: Best Athletes
View Single Post
  #25  
Old 08-02-2005, 10:16 AM
cognito20 cognito20 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13
Default Re: Best Athletes

[ QUOTE ]
I think the answer is fairly obvious. Rugby has by far the best overall athletes. Players have to be multi skilled... backs needs the ability to run, pass, kick, tackle. Forwards need lineout abilities, ruck and maul abilities, scrum abilities etc. Also the game doesn't stop after every play like a certain american sport. I agree backetball also has great athletes, but I think the physical aspect of rugby puts it ahead.

[/ QUOTE ]

While the -average- international Test-class rugby player I think is certainly a better overall athlete than, say, a 335-pound NFL offensive lineman, the BEST athletes in the NFL are much better than the best athletes in rugby. See, rugby's supporters (of which I am one, I have played and loved the sport for years and wish it had a bigger profile in the USA) tend to deride NFL players for the protective equipment they wear during a game, and call rugby more of a "man's" sport because they don't wear protective equipment. Here's why that argument doesn't quite hold water. I have been in the same room with Test-class rugby players, and I have been in the same room with NFL players. NFL players are WAY bigger and stronger, and the good ones, like, say, Lawrence Taylor or Ray Lewis, are WAY faster. Yeah, if a rugby player takes a hit from another rugby player, it's gonna hurt but he's not probably going to need pads. If a typical rugby player got blindsided by someone with the speed and strength of LT, they'd need a spatula to scoop his remains off of the pitch. The only rugby player that I think has that sort of athletic ability, at least the only one who comes right to mind, is Jonah Lomu. NFL players wear pads because they NEED to wear them to avoid serious, serious injury.

Now if you want to make the argument that rugby players, due to the fact that play never technically "stops" (which isn't exactly true.....don't tell me that rugby doesn't offer plenty of rest opportunities during, say, the interval after a long kick for touch or the 213 minutes it generally takes to set up your typical penalty kick for goal), have more CARDIOVASCULAR FITNESS than your typical NFL player, then I might buy it. But that's a different animal from possessing more ATHLETIC ABILITY.
Reply With Quote