Re: Lets try to agree on this:
[ QUOTE ]
For an unknown, should we give credit for the following hands? If more should be added, state which. If some should be retracted, state which.
AQo+, QJs+, 88+.
Too generous? Too conservative? If we agree on a set of hands it should be easier to determine the correct play mathematically.
-DrG
[/ QUOTE ]
i'd say AQo+ KQs+ 99+ is lower bound of what he's capping and if he's on the tight side its AKo+ AQs+ JJ+.
if this was a semi lag guy whose tilting, i like your range.
> hands that dominate you
12 combos of AK
3 combos AQ
6 combos KK
6 combos JJ
> hands you dominate
4 combos KQ
1 combo QQ //we shouldn't put too much emphasis on this hand
6 combos TT
6 combos 99
so with 99 and TT in their range this is a very slim let-me- get-to-showdown-as-cheaply-as-possible situation, and with them not in opponents range this is a clear muck.
stealthcow-
ps. this whole running bad thing, did it start after you cashed out without making 3 small deposits right after?!?!?!
|