Re: spitting midhigh
First off, inquiring minds want to know who is the moderator of the moderators' forum?...heh
I am with Dynasty that we don't need a split bewteen mid limits and high limits. It was tried before and I believe the subsequent merger has proved to be useful.
The split between midhigh casino and midhigh internet makes more sense. The two games are like comparing apples with oranges.
The differences are many - both from a strategy standpoint (eg. Default river calls on the net are often default folds in live play) and from a posting standpoint (eg. online play deals with VPIP, PFR and TA stats as opposed to live play which depends more on subjective reads, tells, image, tilt factor etc.).
Besides, there are a lot of posts on midhigh right now that are simply of no interest to the live player eg. who's the best online player, what's an achievable bb/100 figure etc.
Incidentally, didn't they used to have a "Brick and Mortar" forum. I have no idea what the hell they talked about over there as I never went to it. I ask in case a split along the lines suggested in your scenario 2 will only duplicate the failed "B & M" forum experiment.
|