[Wynton]

[ QUOTE ]
If he's just a LAG who 3-bets liberally and bets and raises most streets without giving much consideration to folding Ace or King high, then I'm not capping much more than my normal capping range.

If he's a thinking LAG or just an overaggressive TAG, then my capping range goes up and starts to include hands like T9s. I'm not capping hands like ATo or A6o or whatnot, but hands where I need the FE and might be able to get it would be more likely to be added to my capping range.

Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

I understand the logic about when you cap a thinking LAG, or an overly aggressive TAG, but not the logic about your approach against the kind of LAG who simply 3-bets liberally. If he's 3-bet us pretty liberally, why not cap with a broader range than your typical range?