Re: NL 5/10 With Bottom Set
Anyway, looked like oddly played 34 or 66, I gotta think with the action, I was beaten.
Oddly played? I think it was brilliantly played if he had either of those hands.
Maybe both? But this is how I would expect most strong players to play these hands. The one possibility that you beat is 87, figuring you'll go through the same logic and will lay down anything weaker than 66. You always have to at least consider that before folding.
This really looks like QT or 22 to me.
No way a solid player calls the cr on the turn with QT. 22 probably doesn't bet on that flop, either.
I think there's no way you're not beat or being bluffed. From there it's just a matter of how often you're being bluffed compared to the pot odds you're getting. Here I don't think it warrants it. Nice laydown IMO.
- C -
|