Re: Trapping the high hand?
[ QUOTE ]
3rd I wouldn't even get involved. You want to be playing hands that scoop. 347 just isn't one of those hands.
Last streets I'm fine on. I'd put 5 on a high hand since a reraise from a 6 low showing didn't slow him down.
[/ QUOTE ]
You want to play hands that scoop, but not 100% of the time against Party players. You can often make decent lows and backdoor into high hands that beat single pairs overplayed, and playing always to scoop is way too tight at these tables (in my opinion). I prefer to think of it as playing for 3/4 of the pot.
|