The Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research did a better job of this. The example is clearer too.
They had volunteers concentrate on influencing various random processes, and they supposedly had statistically significant results over a large number of trials.

http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/
http://skepdic.com/pear.html


If the results were true (which they're not) it would make me more likely to believe in telekinesis, not God. I don't see how telekinesis would make God more or less likely.