[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The average scientific entry in Wikipedia had four errors or omissions, Britannica had three.
[/ QUOTE ]
LINK
Melch
[/ QUOTE ]
So they have 33% more errors, on average. That's what you call "as accurate" as Britannica?
[/ QUOTE ]
Slashdot reported that the Wikipedia articles were also 2.6 times longer on average than Britannica, making Wiki substantially more accurate on a word for word basis.