[Packerfan1]

Which is the better choice:

A) Playing in a "rigged" game where a good player can multitable and make 3BB per hour even if the software "helps" distribute the money.

B) Playing live in an honest casino game where the same good player can expect to make 1BB per hour while dealing with some of the other unpleasantries that live poker brings.

As I recall a pretty famous old-school poker player was once asked why he continued to play in a game he knew was crooked and his response was "Its still the best game in town".

I play 25-30 hours a week, making $35 an hour at a site where I frankly don't believe their shuffle is completely random. I suppose that should be twice as funny to players like you.

Now.. you sure you don't want to ask the question again?

Pack