View Single Post
  #2  
Old 12-12-2005, 11:37 PM
liucipher liucipher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Seat 6, $11s
Posts: 180
Default Re: $11: is this more okay since blinds were about to go up?

It makes sense, but it surprised me:

This is +0.2% against an average range, but +0.8% against a tight range. Against a maniac range it's +0.6% (which may have been more accurate given I got called by QTo).

Just kinda funny since I've been plugging non-pocket pairs into SNGPT, so those tend to have EV calc's that are either increasing or decreasing as you tighten the calling range. . .

Edited to ask: for the $11s, barring no reads, is it smart to just leave the calling range on "loose" or do people like to do average or a mix?
Reply With Quote