Re: Why there will never be a rake war (longwinded)
I agree with a lot of what you say, especially point #1. And I agree that a low rake war is not likely to happen.
However, I'm not sure I agree with point #3. The good players are the best consumers for the poker sites because they play the most. Just because they take money from the bad player and the bad players stop playing, doesn't matter. Even if there were only poor players at a site, you would still have differnet categories, only then it would be "average", "bad", and "terrible" instead of "good", "average", "bad", and "terrible." In short, I think that players would still go broke and stop playing- the only difference being that luck would be more prevalent in who goes broke.
|