Re: Death Penalty Article
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i think this is asign of his increasing instability. not a joke but a serious comment. the fact that virtually every sentence is an an insult to rational argument is beside the point. The fact he feels the need to come out of the Science, Math, philosophy closet and put forward nonsense such as this as official 2 2 poker policy is staggering.
[/ QUOTE ]
2+2 is whatever its owners decide it is. Surely you can't deny that David has a solid background in probability theory. He came up with an interesting application for it, and used his own outlet to express it. So what?
Open your mind a little. Learning about how to apply probability theory to a wide range of complex problems can only improve your Poker game.
[/ QUOTE ]
It's the forum chosen to express the opinions I was commenting on. I have no problem with, and join in wholeheartedly with, discussions on these and other topics in the SM Philosophy forum, the appropriate place for them in DS's domain, imho.
And of course he can do what he wants here. But if support of the death penalty in any form becomes official 2+2 policy then I want, and will not have any, further part of it. My loss maybe but that will be it for me.
|