Re: Thoughts on #4
Expanding B's raising criteria to pre-empt A makes sense to me.
But the rest of what you say conflicts with your solution to the problem: You have B value-raising exactly the same hands in #3 and #4 (5/6 through 1).
But you have B bluff-raising more often in #4 (1/9) than in #3 (1/18). That makes no sense to me if "the bluff-raise criterion is set by the value-raise criterion."
But I definitely see your point on B making some additional pre-emptive raises. It's just a little surprizing to me that you don't then expand B's value-raises at all.
|