[KingOtter]

1. You're making a spectacular claim.
2. You're providing absolutely no proof that these events even happened. Not even one hand. Most sites even let you go in and request the last 100 hand histories, so you would at LEAST have this available to you, even if you don't 'keep hand histories'. I bet you could get even more if you e-mailed support. So your excuse for not having the hand histories is poor at best.
3. It is not naive, nor irrational to doubt you. In fact, it is completely rational to completely dismiss your claims based upon both 1 and 2.
4. It is irrational to expect a community of online-poker-players (who see this issue come up weekly) to believe you without any proof or substance.

So stop with the silliness.

KO