[ QUOTE ]
The thing is, he is a good player. He has read the books, and know what he is doing.
He shows a winrate of about 3BB/100 at party and Pokerrrom over a much larger sample (don't remember how many though).
However, when playing at Absolute, he claims that the players are playing in a different manner, and the fact that he has lost money over 5000 hands (again, don't know how much) prooves, that he cannot beat Absolute 2/4.

I don't see any difference in the play, I see just as many hardcore-no-odds chasers at Absolute as Party has got.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nonetheless, he has a lack of understanding of some basic math and variance principles. He is wrong and you can easily go on a bad run for way more than 5K hands.