Re: Is it that hard to actually put the why with the what?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
SB is clever TAG, only other "above average" player in the game.
[/ QUOTE ]
It seems that no one else at the table is above average other than the SB.
sorry, couldn't resist.......this is not good, and particularly so given your descriptions.
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't mind the sarcasm, as long as you provide an explanation. I'm in the hijack. The button is tight, so are the blinds. Its very likely i'm in front of the UTG limper, and if not she's so predictable playing against her postflop is extremely easy. Are you criticizing preflop? I thought this was pretty standard.
The flop is what might be questionable, hence the post, but I'm really getting tired of people like you posting "this is bad", and then not bothering to explain why. Why bother posting in a strategy forum if you aren't going to include any strategy in your posts?
As far as the flop goes, if you think its so horrible, give me a range of hands for the UTG limper (after she calls 2 more cold on the flop, which obviously a weak/tight player won't do with overcards) that doesn't have me drawing to running outs?
lf
[/ QUOTE ]
Fair enough. Pre flop is standard for me, but there isnt much point in playing that way if you are going to fold to a little pressure on a pretty darn good flop for you.
SB could have a ton of stuff you beat including a worse 9. Limper could have any number of pair and draw hands as well as no pair hands like J10s. 88,66, 89, 78. Thinking you need running outs based on the action so far is way off IMO.
If you want to play it safe, call the 3 bet. Then if limper has the monster you are afraid of she will raise SBs lead on the turn and you can muck. Since she wont put a play on you this is probably a safe way to go.
I'm not putting anyone on a straight or sete quite yet.....
|